Case study

Carbon footprint example in the food industry: the Gruppo Orsero case study

Carbon footprint example in the food industry: the Gruppo Orsero case study

INDUSTRY

Import and distribution of fresh fruit
and vegetables

YEAR

2025

TYPE

Carbon Footprint & ESG reporting

LOCATION

Italy

About Gruppo Orsero

About Gruppo Orsero

Gruppo Orsero is one of the leading companies in Mediterranean Europe specialising in the import and distribution of fresh fruit and vegetables.

The Group manages an integrated supply chain covering sourcing, maritime transport, ripening, storage and distribution. Every year, it markets approximately 890,000 tonnes of products, operating through an extensive network of companies, market stands, ripening facilities, packaging sites and distribution warehouses.

This complex supply chain makes Orsero a particularly interesting Carbon Footprint example in the food industry. Like any large organisation, Gruppo Orsero faces specific operational complexities. Its owned shipping fleet, cold chain operations and international supply chain result in a distribution of emissions across Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 that differs from that of many other companies in the sector.

Gruppo Orsero needed to represent these specific characteristics through a common methodology that could be applied across its different companies, replicated year after year and aligned with the GHG Protocol and the quantitative information required under ESRS E1.

With Metrikflow, the Group structured its carbon accounting system, improving data traceability and building a solid foundation for reporting, verification and future decarbonisation initiatives.

Project Scope

Corporate Carbon Footprint

Reference standards

GHG Protocol and ESRS E1

The Challenge

Measuring emissions across an integrated food supply chain

Measuring emissions across an integrated food supply chain

For Gruppo Orsero, measuring emissions means collecting data from 18 legal entities across several countries, including Italy, Spain, France, Portugal, Greece, Mexico and Costa Rica, and consolidating them under a single methodology.

Energy consumption, fuels, refrigerants, transport, waste and purchased products therefore had to be collected and organised according to common and standardised criteria. At the same time, the model needed to retain sufficient detail to represent the specific characteristics of each operating entity.

One of the main complexities involved the correct allocation of emissions. Maritime transport is often associated with Scope 3, but in Orseroโ€™s case, the presence of an owned shipping fleet means that a significant share of these emissions falls under Scope 1.

The cold chain also required a specific approach, as emissions generated by refrigerants, warehouses and refrigerated transport belong to different Scopes despite originating from closely interconnected activities.

To build a complete picture, the Group also needed to analyse Scope 3 and identify its priority categories. Purchased products represent a major share of the Carbon Footprint, but accurately accounting for them required a calculation methodology based primarily on physical quantities rather than spend data.


The main objectives were to:

For Gruppo Orsero, measuring emissions means collecting data from 18 legal entities across several countries, including Italy, Spain, France, Portugal, Greece, Mexico and Costa Rica, and consolidating them under a single methodology.

Energy consumption, fuels, refrigerants, transport, waste and purchased products therefore had to be collected and organised according to common and standardised criteria. At the same time, the model needed to retain sufficient detail to represent the specific characteristics of each operating entity.

One of the main complexities involved the correct allocation of emissions. Maritime transport is often associated with Scope 3, but in Orseroโ€™s case, the presence of an owned shipping fleet means that a significant share of these emissions falls under Scope 1.

The cold chain also required a specific approach, as emissions generated by refrigerants, warehouses and refrigerated transport belong to different Scopes despite originating from closely interconnected activities.

To build a complete picture, the Group also needed to analyse Scope 3 and identify its priority categories. Purchased products represent a major share of the Carbon Footprint, but accurately accounting for them required a calculation methodology based primarily on physical quantities rather than spend data.


The main objectives were to:

Calculate the companyโ€™s Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions;

Calculate the companyโ€™s Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions;

Standardise data collection across companies, sites and activities;

Standardise data collection across companies, sites and activities;

Improve the traceability of sources, assumptions and methodologies;

Improve the traceability of sources, assumptions and methodologies;

Prepare the quantitative data required under ESRS E1;

Prepare the quantitative data required under ESRS E1;

Identify priorities for future decarbonisation initiatives.

Identify priorities for future decarbonisation initiatives.

The Solution

How Gruppo Orsero structured Scope 1, 2 and 3 with Metrikflow

How Gruppo Orsero structured Scope 1, 2 and 3 with Metrikflow

Metrikflow supported Gruppo Orsero in building a structured system for calculating Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, aligned with the GHG Protocol and organised to address the quantitative requirements of ESRS E1 through its proprietary Carbon Footprint software.

The project started by defining the boundaries and methodology within the platform. For each emission source, the required activity data, units of measurement, emission factors and assumptions to be documented were identified.

Data collection was organised through a common model that could be applied across the Groupโ€™s different companies. Information related to energy, fuels, refrigerants, logistics, waste and purchased goods was brought into a consistent and verifiable structure.

For Scope 1, the analysis covered sources directly managed by the Group, including fuel used by the shipping fleet and refrigerant gas leaks. Scope 2 was calculated using both location-based and market-based approaches, while Scope 3 was structured around the categories most relevant to Orseroโ€™s activities.

Sources, versions, methodologies and calculation steps were organised within the platform in a traceable way, supporting internal controls and the preparation of results for reporting.

Metrikflow supported Gruppo Orsero in building a structured system for calculating Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, aligned with the GHG Protocol and organised to address the quantitative requirements of ESRS E1 through its proprietary Carbon Footprint software.

The project started by defining the boundaries and methodology within the platform. For each emission source, the required activity data, units of measurement, emission factors and assumptions to be documented were identified.

Data collection was organised through a common model that could be applied across the Groupโ€™s different companies. Information related to energy, fuels, refrigerants, logistics, waste and purchased goods was brought into a consistent and verifiable structure.

For Scope 1, the analysis covered sources directly managed by the Group, including fuel used by the shipping fleet and refrigerant gas leaks. Scope 2 was calculated using both location-based and market-based approaches, while Scope 3 was structured around the categories most relevant to Orseroโ€™s activities.

Sources, versions, methodologies and calculation steps were organised within the platform in a traceable way, supporting internal controls and the preparation of results for reporting.

centralise emissions data from different companies

centralise emissions data from different companies

apply a common methodology to Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions

apply a common methodology to Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions

document data sources, assumptions and calculation methodologies

document data sources, assumptions and calculation methodologies

customise ESG tables according to the companyโ€™s categories;

prepare the information required for sustainability reporting in accordance with GRI Standards;

identify areas where data quality could be improved in future reporting cycles.

track sources, versions and controls performed on the data

ensure GHG and ESRS compliance

identify areas of improvement and decarbonisation opportunities

The journey with Metrikflow

The journey with Metrikflow

1

Defining the organisational boundary

The first step was to define the organisational and operational boundaries of the project, identifying the companies, sites and activities to be included. For Gruppo Orsero, this meant representing a structure made up of market stands, warehouses, ripening centres, logistics activities and maritime transport. The presence of operations managed directly by the Group required particular attention when allocating emissions across the different Scopes. Defining the boundaries made it possible to distinguish direct emission sources from those related to the value chain and to create a consistent basis for consolidating the results.

2

Building a common methodology for Scope 1, 2 and 3

Metrikflow helped Gruppo Orsero define standardised calculation methodologies aligned with the GHG Protocol and the structure of ESRS E1. For each source, the required data, units of measurement, emission factors and conversion criteria were identified. Boundaries and assumptions were documented to make calculations replicable and easier to verify as part of the process of obtaining ISO 14064 certification. This approach enables the Groupโ€™s different entities to follow common criteria while consolidating environmental data without losing visibility over individual emission contributions.

3

Organising data collection and control

Information was organised through a shared structure capable of managing data from different functions, companies and sites. Energy consumption, fuels, refrigerant leaks, transport, waste and purchases were brought together within a single model. Validation workflows, version management and links to source documentation strengthened the overall quality of the inventory. Each data point can be traced back to the relevant company, site, activity, reporting period and responsible person. This also improved coordination between the people involved in collecting and reviewing information. Employee commuting provides a concrete example of how Gruppo Orsero improved data quality throughout the project. Initially estimated using general assumptions, these emissions were later calculated through a questionnaire distributed across all Group companies. This made it possible to replace a general estimate with information collected directly from employees, providing a more accurate representation of their commuting habits.

4

Analysing the shipping fleet and cold chain

The analysis highlighted several dynamics that are particularly relevant to a Carbon Footprint in the food industry. The Groupโ€™s owned shipping fleet generates a significant share of its direct emissions. Maritime fuel accounts for approximately 28% of the total footprint, showing how a companyโ€™s operating model can significantly affect the distribution of emissions across the different Scopes. The cold chain revealed a second important element. Refrigerant gas leaks account for approximately 23,000 tCOโ‚‚e, compared with around 7,500 tCOโ‚‚e associated with Scope 2 electricity. This result made it possible to view refrigeration, storage and temperature-controlled transport as parts of the same operational system.

5

Structuring Scope 3 across the food supply chain

Metrikflow supported Orsero in identifying and prioritising its Scope 3 categories, including purchased goods, upstream and downstream transportation, and waste management. Purchased goods and services represent the largest share of emissions. For this category, 98.9% of emissions were calculated using physical data related to approximately 890,000 tonnes of fruit, vegetables and packaging, while only 1.1% was based on spend-related estimates for services. This approach provides a significantly more accurate representation than the spend-based methods commonly used in corporate Carbon Footprint assessments in the food industry. By linking emissions to the actual quantities purchased, the inventory makes it possible to identify more precisely which products and materials contribute most to the Groupโ€™s overall footprint. In a food Carbon Footprint, this step is essential for further improving data granularity through more specific information on products, suppliers and regions of origin, supporting increasingly targeted reduction initiatives across the supply chain.

6

Preparing results for ESRS and assurance

The results were organised to feed into the quantitative tables required under ESRS E1. The structure distinguishes between Scopes, categories, companies and emission sources while maintaining consistency across the different datasets. Methodologies, factors and assumptions remain available for control and verification activities. Gruppo Orsero therefore has information that can be integrated into ESG reporting and a solid foundation to support future assurance processes.

The Results

A complete system for Scope 1, 2 and 3

Gruppo Orsero now has a structured system for calculating and consolidating emissions from both its operations and its value chain.

The common methodology makes results comparable across companies and reporting periods while maintaining visibility over the activities that contribute most to the overall footprint.

Data organised for ESRS E1

The results were prepared according to a structure compatible with the quantitative information required for climate reporting.

Tables, Scope breakdowns and category-level details can be integrated into the Groupโ€™s disclosure processes, reducing the need for subsequent manual reworking.

Greater information traceability

Sources, emission factors, assumptions and data versions are collected consistently.

The Group can reconstruct calculation steps, identify potential anomalies and provide auditors with more organised information during verification and assurance activities. The shift from an estimate of employee commuting to a Group-wide questionnaire also demonstrates how the system can support measurable improvements in data quality over time.

Simpler sustainability reporting

The preparation of the sustainability report was simplified through a data structure aligned with GRI Standards.

A clearer understanding of future data needs

The project helped Caleffi identify which information will be most important for making future reporting cycles more accurate, particularly across the value chain.

Less time spent and more reliable results

Data centralisation and automated calculations helped the team reduce the time spent collecting and managing information, limit manual errors and improve the overall quality of the work.

A more accurate view of operational emissions

The analysis highlighted the role of the shipping fleet and cold chain in Orseroโ€™s emissions profile.

It also showed that four Group entities together account for 78.7% of total emissions.

This visibility enables Orsero to identify where reduction measures can generate the greatest impact and to focus decarbonisation investments on the most relevant facilities and activities.

Clearer priorities across the supply chain

The Scope 3 analysis confirmed the central role of purchased products and provided a detailed view based primarily on physical data.

With 98.9% of emissions related to purchased goods and services calculated using the actual quantities of fruit, vegetables and packaging, Gruppo Orsero can identify the most relevant product categories more precisely and develop more targeted supplier engagement and decarbonisation initiatives.

A scalable foundation for future climate targets

The system can evolve alongside reporting requirements and improvements in data quality.

The same structure can support future inventories, verification activities, reduction targets and analyses of the highest-emitting categories.

Working with Metrikflow allowed us to structure our Carbon Footprint in line with ESRS requirements and improve the reliability of our ESG data.


- Gaia Cacciabue, Sustainability Manager at Gruppo Orsero

โ€œ

Want to build a carbon analysis tailored to your supply chain?

With Metrikflow, you can collect and verify data from different business activities, structure Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, and prepare traceable results for reporting and assurance through a simple platform with intuitive dashboards.

Working with Metrikflow allowed us to transform sustainability into a structured, verifiable process. Achieving ISO 14064 is a milestone weโ€™re proud of, and it reflects our commitment to a sustainable future.


- Lorenzo Magliocchetti โ€” Balocco Sustainability Manager

โ€œ

ESG radar: The Metrikflow Newsletter

Everything you need to know about sustainability,
all-in-one email. Weekly insights. Zero spam.

By submitting this form, you consent to receive the requested resource. For more information on how we process and protect your data, view our Privacy Policy.

Ask AI for a summary of Metrikflow

chatgptclaudeperplexity

Contact Us

Solutions

Resources

Would you like to centralise your companyโ€™s ESG data?

With Metrikflow, you can calculate your Scope 1, 2 and 3 Corporate Carbon Footprint, streamline sustainability reporting, automate data collection and maintain full traceability across data, sources and methodologies.

ESG radar: The Metrikflow Newsletter

Everything you need to know about sustainability,
all-in-one email. Weekly insights. Zero spam.

By submitting this form, you consent to receive the requested resource. For more information on how we process and protect your data, view our Privacy Policy.

Ask AI for a summary of Metrikflow

chatgptclaudeperplexity